Last week, on election day in the U.S., the state of Maine rejected “Question 3” on the ballot, scraping the idea of eliminating the state’s pair of investor-owned utilities and replacing them with a new nonprofit power company for the entire state.
Voters rejected the Pine Tree Power idea and will continue to work with the only two utility companies in the state; Central Maine Power (CMP) and Versant. CMP is owned by Avangrid (a subsidiary of Spanish multinational utility Iberdrola), and Versant is owned by ENMAX in Canada. Had the ballot measure succeeded, Mainers would have bought out the two companies, which together handle more than 96 percent of the state’s electricity demand, and establish a new, unified nonprofit utility called Pine Tree Power. The ballot measure lost by a considerable margin, with 71% of voters opposing it and only 29% supporting it.
Many in the climate space see this as a bellwether for climate policy in the U.S. Nebraska is the only state where consumer-owned power suppliers provide 100% of the state’s electricity, and had Maine supported Pine Tree Power, the deal would have made Maine a model for other states to follow.
CMP and Versant spent more than $40 million to defeat Pine Tree Power, according to Grist. The two companies outspent advocates by 34 to 1. Our Power, the advocacy group behind Pine Tree Power spent just $1.3 million.
That’s not uncommon for either power company, which has actively lobbied against climate change initiatives in the past. According to The Washington Post, in 2017, Central Maine Power and Republican state lawmakers helped kill a pro-rooftop solar bill. CMP and Versant both launched super PACs to advance their goal of killing Question 3, which would have essentially put both power companies out of business in the state.
The big spend succeeded in convincing Mainers to reject the proposal by arguing that it would cost more than advocates said it would, lead to higher rates for customers, and years of legal battles. Even the Democratic Governor of Maine, Janet Mills, who has called for the state to go all in on green electricity by 2040, spoke out against the proposition, arguing that it would lead to long, drawn-out legal battles.
Advocates said that buying out the utility companies would have cost anywhere from $8.25 billion to $13.5 billion, and would have allowed for easier green energy transition. Maine has some of the highest energy costs in the country, coupled with one of the most unreliable grids. They also underscored the fact that both CMP and Versant are owned and operated by foreign companies, who would have almost certainly fought the proposition in lengthy, expensive, and drawn-out court proceedings.
Customers have accused both companies of charging exorbitant rates, exacerbating prolonged outages, and having poor customer service. It has been egregious enough that in past years, state regulators have fined CMP $10 million for improperly sending disconnection notices to hundreds of customers and misbilling hundreds of thousands. CMP has also been accused of dragging its feet when connecting solar projects to the grid. CMP also lobbied hard to kill a rooftop solar program in Maine in 2017. CMP and Versant control over 96% of Maine’s electricity demand.
CMP and Versant attacked the project's estimated cost. Supporters did not offer a counter to the argument, noting that a judge or other third party would ultimately decide just how much it would cost Maine consumers. Our Power, the advocacy group that supported the referendum, argued that they would have negotiated the lowest possible price for the transition and said that any legal challenges could have been resolved within three to four years.
The median income in Maine is around $63,000 per year, which is below the national median income of around $69,000 per year, and a multi-billion dollar project would be difficult for customers to cover.
What is clear is that Mainers need a utility revamp, but after the defeat of Question 3, the path forward is unclear.
While other localities like Winter Park, Florida, and Jefferson County, Washington, have successfully taken over their grids, Nebraska is currently the only state where consumer-owned power suppliers provide 100% of the state’s electricity. Maine would have been the second state to move in that direction had Question 3 passed, and represented the largest effort for public control of the grid to date.
At the heart of the issue that climate advocates focused on was connecting green power projects to the grid, something that most utility companies have been slow to implement. Those who support public power say that energy should be affordable, reliable, and accountable to its customers and argue that the only way to achieve those goals is by creating a publicly managed and owned electric grid. As Grist notes, advocates say that “only a publicly owned and managed electric grid can rise to the challenge of climate change by providing renewable power as a public good and serving the needs and interests of the people using it, rather than shareholders.”
The vote in Maine was closely watched by other leaders in states like New York and New Mexico. Three-quarters of customers in the U.S. are served by investor-owned utilities, and as the confluence of high electricity rates, exceedingly slow transition to renewable energy sources, and increasing incidence of massive storms and events that result in long and frequently dangerous blackouts come together, the appetite for publicly owned utilities has increased. Clearly, however, there is a limit to just how much voters are willing to spend on the green electric grid transition.
While many climate advocates around the country were keeping a close eye on the outcome of the referendum as a bellwether, those who supported Question 3 say that the fight is far from over. We’ll continue to keep an eye on what shakes out with other climate-focused referendums around the country to get a better understanding of just how the green grid transition might shake out.
Check out some of the latest featured jobs below. If you don't see anything that speaks to you, you can always go to Climatebase to explore thousands of other opportunities.
“Kaluza is the intelligent energy platform enabling the world’s largest energy companies to lead the way in the energy transition. From revolutionising energy retail operations to smart electric vehicle charging, our software is empowering energy suppliers to deliver market-leading experiences for their customers and drive decarbonisation. Launching in 2019, we’ve grown rapidly to over 400 employees across the UK, Portugal and ...”
“Antora Energy is electrifying heavy industry with zero-carbon heat and power. We make it possible and profitable to fully rely on renewable energy for industrial processes. Antora Energy's thermal energy storage soaks up excess solar and wind electricity and uses it to heat blocks of carbon so they glow like inside a toaster (but very bright!). This thermal energy is then delivered to ...”
“We are on a mission to regenerate soil at a planetary scale—automated terraforming, with a solar powered robotics platform. Planetary recovery through the soil - More than 50% of our soils are degraded—by chemicals and soil management practices that undercut carbon sequestration potential. At Aigen, we are restoring our planet's health, through the land and our soils with an affordable, precision ...”
“We're Twelve, a new kind of chemical company built for the climate era. Our breakthrough technology eliminates emissions by turning CO2 into essential products. We call it carbon transformation. Reinventing what it means to be a chemical company, we're on a mission to create a climate positive world and a fossil free future. ...”
“Patch is building the infrastructure for a sustainable economy by enabling gigatonne scale carbon removal. With Patch, companies can embed climate action into their own products, neutralizing the carbon impact of everyday transactions like shipping, travel and financial services, or neutralize the unavoidable emissions within their operations and supply chain. From an API-integration to direct purchase, Patch is the carbon ...”
“EnergyHub empowers utilities and their customers to create a clean, distributed energy future We’re working on accomplishing this vision by transforming complexity at the grid edge into reliable resources for utilities. ...”
“Carbon Direct is decarbonizing the global economy. What is Carbon Direct? We are a team of scientists, engineers, and innovators with a shared goal of reducing atmospheric CO2 by scaling carbon management. What do we do? We operate two distinct businesses: - Advisory & Software : We work with Fortune 500 corporate clients like Microsoft, Shopify, and Alaska Airlines to develop long-term carbon management plans. ...”
“A nonpartisan, nonprofit organization, the Great Plains Institute is transforming the energy system to benefit the economy and environment. We work on solutions that strengthen communities and provide greater economic opportunity through creation of higher paying jobs, expansion of the nation’s industrial base, and greater domestic energy independence while eliminating carbon emissions. GPI’s goals for transforming the energy system are to - increase ...”
“WeaveGrid builds software to make it cheaper and safer for utilities to serve electric vehicles, add renewable energy resources, and save customers money. Our mission is to drive rapid decarbonization in the global transport and power sectors by intelligently connecting electric vehicles to the grid. We are currently in market with early utility clients, and we must rapidly build and deliver ...”
“Based in Asbury Park, Solar Landscape is a leading full-service provider of community solar and solar energy solutions for the commercial/industrial, municipal, public school and non-profit marketplaces. The company employs more than 130 people and has more than 200 megawatts of solar energy projects completed or under construction. The company owns and operates one of the largest portfolios of community solar ...”
“Advanced Energy United educates, engages, and advocates for policies that allow our member companies to compete to repower our economy with 100% clean energy. We work with decision makers at every level of government as well as regulators of energy markets to achieve this goal. The businesses we represent are lowering consumer costs, creating millions of new jobs, and providing the full range of clean, efficient, and reliable energy and transportation solutions. Today, these businesses have a combined market capitalization in excess of $3 trillion. Together, we ...”
Evergreen Consulting Group LLC
“Evergreen is a full-service energy-efficiency program design and management firm serving utilities and energy organizations nationwide. We are widely recognized for our success with innovative commercial, residential and industrial energy initiatives. Our team is united in implementing outstanding programs that deliver exceptional results. As a Certified B Corporation, we walk our talk in ways that delight our clients, empower our ...”
“VIDA is an impact-driven startup enabling companies to track their impact across thousands or even millions of locations. With our diverse team of 34 colleagues from more than 15 nationalities, we are passionate about making a positive difference in the world. ...”
“About Us: We’re Impulse . We’re a team of engineers, designers, and innovators based in San Francisco who believe making good decisions for your home and the environment should not come at a cost to your lifestyle. We’re dedicated to building delightful, high-performance products for everyday needs that enable rewarding, long-term, scalable solutions for whole-home electrification. We're looking for individuals excited to ...”
“Who is Optera? We deliver software and expert services to help the world’s largest companies stop climate change. Our market-leading products provide companies with the tools and insight they need to reduce the environmental impacts of their businesses, supply chains, and products. We are backed by some of the most respected US-based venture capital firms and have a robust client list, ...”
“Scoot Science is a California-based, remote-first startup founded in 2017 by a team of experienced oceanographers, agricultural economists, software engineers, and data scientists. We promote responsible and sustainable use of our oceans. Our team is dedicated to illuminating the linkages between ocean conditions and the ocean economy through operational intelligence, data analysis, and forecasting. Our goal is to give our customers ...”
That's it for this week! Remember, you can always view thousands of more jobs on Climatebase.org.
Final reminders...
👋 Get discovered. Create a profile to have employers hire you.
🚀 Accelerate your climate career. Apply to join the Climatebase Fellowship.
🌱 Hiring? Post your jobs to reach over 250k monthly users users and over 100,000 newsletter readers.
❤️️ Share a link to this week's edition.
🐦 Let's connect! Follow us on Twitter @Climatebase, and our co-founders @evandhynes and @jhardin925
In today's edition of This Week in Climate, we examine the implications of President-elect Donald Trump's recent appointments and policy directions on U.S. climate action.
In This Week in Climate, we look at the wins for climate action in Tuesday’s election against an otherwise grim result.
In the latest edition of This Week in Climate, we analyze the US presidential candidates' stance on climate.
In today's edition of This Week in Climate, we explore the growing attention on Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), a massive US-backed funding opportunity for next-gen reactor tech, and why SMRs could be a critical piece in addressing both energy shortages and climate change.
In today's edition of This Week in Climate, we take a look at countries backpedaling on agreed climate goals, and why it's happening.